1967 v. 2006

Posted 2 years ago by Bear

1967

2006

4 Comments

Adam Gautsch ~ 2 years ago

Err.. I say the 1967 movie could only be done in 1967 but I think I'm lying. The more I look at it the more 'Web 2.0-y' it looks.

olivier blanchard ~ 2 years ago

The chip stacking is kind of slack though.

... Although Carl Jung might interpret it differently.

Adam Gautsch ~ 2 years ago

RE: Olivier's Comment:

The poker was the most unbelievable part of the entire movie.

-----------------POSSIBLE SPOILER---------------

Final hand- flush loses to full house loses to bigger full house loses to straight flush. That happens.

Evan Tishuk ~ 2 years ago

Yeah, I thought they could have done a more believable job on the central pillar of the movie. The poker was disrespectfully awful.

Join the Conversation

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
13 + 6 =

For reservations, call office864.335.9161. Send fan mail to our work location at 300 East Stone Avenue, Greenville, SC 29609 USA 34.85984128288701 -82.38952159881592
Lovingly crafted by orangecoat with some rights reserved, and a promise not to spam you.

Back to top